In a bold political maneuver, former Vice President and 2023 PDP presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar has announced a coalition of opposition parties to unseat President Bola Tinubu in the 2027 elections. The declaration, made during a fiery press conference at Abuja’s Yar’Adua Centre, comes escalating tensions over Tinubu’s controversial state of emergency declaration in Rivers State—a move opposition leaders are calling unconstitutional and a threat to democracy.
The Birth of the Coalition: Atiku’s 2027 Play
Flanked by opposition leaders, Atiku declared, “Yes, this is the birth of the coalition of opposition ahead of 2027,” signaling a unified front against the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). The coalition aims to consolidate dissenting voices ahead of the next general elections, capitalizing on widespread criticism of Tinubu’s handling of Nigeria’s political and economic crises.
The timing is strategic. The announcement follows Tinubu’s March 18, 2025, proclamation of a state of emergency in Rivers State, suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, and the state assembly. Opposition leaders argue the move is a thinly veiled power grab, exploiting a protracted political feud between Fubara and pro-APC lawmakers.
Rivers State Crisis: The Trigger
The Rivers State turmoil began when 27 state assembly members defected from the PDP to the APC, lost their seats under constitutional provisions, and sparked a legal battle. The Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of Governor Fubara, but Tinubu’s emergency declaration—citing “public safety” concerns—overrode the judgment.
Opposition leaders accuse Tinubu of manufacturing a crisis to install federal control:
Suspended democratic structures: Elected officials replaced by a handpicked administrator.
Alleged constitutional breaches: Bypassing impeachment protocols (Section 188) and misusing emergency powers (Section 305).
Political bias: Critics claim Tinubu’s actions favor APC-aligned factions in Rivers.
Legal Firestorm: Opposition’s Constitutional Objections
In a joint statement, opposition stakeholders outlined four key violations:
1. Illegal Removal of Officials: The Constitution mandates impeachment (Section 188), not presidential decrees, to remove governors.
2. Misuse of Emergency Powers: Section 305 allows emergencies only during war, natural disasters, or existential threats—none of which apply here.
3. Bypassing Legislative Oversight: Tinubu’s proclamation lacks required National Assembly approval (a two-thirds majority).
4. Ignoring Legal Alternatives: The President could have invoked Section 11 (federal intervention in state legislatures) without suspending elected officials.
“This is not about security—it’s about power,” the coalition asserted, accusing Tinubu of undermining federalism to consolidate APC dominance.
The Opposition’s Demands: Reversal or Resistance?
The coalition issued urgent calls to action:
Revoke the emergency declaration and reinstate Rivers’ elected government.
National Assembly rejection: Lawmakers must block approval of Tinubu’s “unconstitutional” move.
Judicial intervention: Courts should strike down the proclamation to prevent a “dangerous precedent.”
Public mobilization: Nigerians are urged to defend democracy through peaceful resistance.
Political Implications: A New Era of Opposition Unity?
Atiku’s coalition marks a pivotal shift in Nigeria’s political landscape:
PDP-Allied Forces: Smaller parties and defectors from the APC may rally under this umbrella.
2027 Strategy: The alliance could unify anti-Tinubu votes, leveraging discontent over inflation, insecurity, and perceived autocratic tendencies.
Risks: Internal cohesion is critical; past opposition alliances have fractured over competing ambitions.
Public reaction is mixed. While some hail the coalition as a democratic safeguard, others question its motives. “Is this about saving democracy or reclaiming power?” tweeted activist @DemocracyFirstNG.
Tinubu’s Defense: Crisis Management or Overreach?
The presidency defends the emergency declaration, citing rampant pipeline vandalism and threats to oil production—a cornerstone of Nigeria’s economy. However, opponents retort that security agencies (under federal control) failed to act, exposing Tinubu’s prioritization of politics over governance.
Conclusion: A Turning Point for Nigerian Democracy?
As legal battles loom and the 2027 race heats up, Atiku’s coalition tests Nigeria’s democratic resilience. Will opposition unity hold, or will Tinubu’s incumbency and APC machinery prevail? For Nigerians, the stakes transcend Rivers State—this is a fight for constitutional integrity and the soul of federalism.
Your Take
Is Tinubu’s emergency declaration justified, or is it a democratic backslide? Can Atiku’s coalition pose a credible threat in 2027? Share your thoughts below.
Page manager
