Islamic Scholar Endorses Death Penalty for Apostasy
Dr. Ibrahim Jalingo, a prominent Islamic cleric and National Chairman of the Council of Ulama, has ignited a fierce debate by endorsing the death penalty for Muslims who renounce their faith. In a recent Facebook post, he defended a controversial Hadith stating, "Whoever changes his religion, kill him," while accusing critics of "compound ignorance."
The Hadith in Question: Authenticity and Interpretation
A Hadith is a recorded saying or action of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), serving as a key Islamic text second only to the Quran. Critics argue that this particular Hadith contradicts Quranic teachings on religious freedom. However, Jalingo insists it is divinely inspired and aligns with Islamic scripture.
Jalingo’s Theological Defense
In his post, Jalingo presented a detailed rebuttal, citing Quranic verses to justify the punishment for apostasy:
1. Surah At-Tawbah 9:5 – "Then, when the sacred months have passed, kill the polytheists wherever you find them."
2. Surah Al-Baqarah 2:193 – "Fight them until there is no more fitnah (disbelief) and religion is for Allah alone."
3. Surah An-Nisa 4:89 & 91 – "Kill them wherever you find them."
He argued that these verses override the Quran’s famous declaration, "There is no compulsion in religion" (2:256), claiming it was abrogated (naskh).by later revelations.
Global Reactions: Support vs. Outrage
Jalingo’s remarks have gone viral, sparking polarizing responses:
✔ Supporters applaud him for upholding traditional Islamic jurisprudence.
❌ Critics, including moderate Muslims and human rights advocates, condemn his stance as extremist and dangerous.
Why This Debate Matters
Religious Freedom – Many Muslim-majority nations enforce apostasy laws, but interpretations vary.
Human Rights Concerns– International organizations oppose capital punishment for apostasy.
Theological Divide – Scholars debate whether such Hadiths apply in modern contexts.
Final Thoughts
Dr. Jalingo’s defense of apostasy laws highlights deep divisions within Islam. While hardliners see it as protecting faith, opponents argue it violates Quranic principles of mercy and free will. The discussion raises critical questions about scriptural interpretation, human rights, and religious tolerance in today’s world.
What do you think? Should apostasy be punishable by death, or is religious choice a fundamental right? Share your views below.
Page manager
