The Nigerian gospel music scene is buzzing after a heated debate between Pastor Femi Lazarus and award-winning singer Timi Dakolo over financial fairness for gospel artists. The discussion, sparked by Lazarus’s critique of gospel musicians charging performance fees, has ignited conversations about ministry, artistry, and sustainable structures in the industry. Here’s a breakdown of the clash and what it means for the future.
Femi Lazarus Praises Timi Dakolo’s Advocacy on Instagram
In a recent Instagram post, Pastor Femi Lazarus shared a photo with Timi Dakolo and Pastor Emmanuel Iren, applauding Dakolo’s concern for gospel musicians’ welfare. Describing Dakolo as a “music legend,” Lazarus urged fans to “give him his flowers” and acknowledged the singer’s genuine passion for addressing systemic issues.
“My brother Timi Dakolo carries the burdens of musicians. His concerns are real. We will build better structures together,” Lazarus wrote, emphasizing the need for hosts, artists, and institutions to collaborate for progress.
How the Gospel Music Payment Debate Began
The controversy started after Lazarus criticized gospel artists who demand high fees for church performances during a sermon. He argued that “music ministers” (those called to ministry) shouldn’t commercialize their gifts, unlike “music artists” in the secular industry.
Lazarus clarified:
- Ministers vs. Artists: True gospel ministers, he claimed, should prioritize divine calling over profit, while artists can operate as entertainers.
- Church Responsibility:* He urged churches to support their music ministers financially, admitting many struggle due to lack of institutional backing.
Timi Dakolo’s Counterargument: “Fair Pay is Non-Negotiable”
Dakolo swiftly challenged Lazarus’s stance, highlighting the hypocrisy of criticizing artists for charging fees while Lazarus himself runs a paid ministry school. The “Great Nation” singer stressed:
- Gospel musicians deserve fair compensation for their work, just like secular artists.
- Undervaluing gospel music perpetuates financial struggles within the industry.
Key Takeaways: Ministry, Artistry, and Financial Sustainability
The debate raises critical questions about the Nigerian gospel music industry:
1. Defining Roles: Should gospel musicians be viewed as “ministers” or “artists”? Can they balance both?
2. Fair Compensation: How can churches and event organizers pay gospel artists fairly without commercializing faith?
3. Systemic Change: Lazarus’s call for “better structures” underscores the need for healthcare, pensions, and grants to support gospel musicians.
The Path Forward: Collaboration and Reform
Both Lazarus and Dakolo agree on one thing: the current system is broken. In his Instagram post, Lazarus vowed:
“This generation will not inherit a carryover of pain. Hosts, guests, and institutions will do better.”
For real change, stakeholders must:
- Support Music Ministers: Churches should provide salaries or stipends to full-time gospel musicians.
- Value Artistic Labor: Event organizers must budget fairly for gospel performers.
- Advocate for Policies: Industry leaders could push for guilds or unions to protect artists’ rights.
Conclusion
The Femi Lazarus-Timi Dakolo debate has spotlighted long-standing financial tensions in Nigeria’s gospel music scene. While their perspectives differ, their shared goal—a sustainable, equitable future for gospel artists—offers hope. As audiences, churches, and artists rethink their roles, one thing is clear: giving musicians their “flowers” means respecting their craft and their livelihoods.
Engage with Us: What’s your take? Should gospel musicians charge performance fees? Share your thoughts in the comments!
Page manager
